In the disorder of combat, which attribute should not be sacrificed for brevity?

In the context of tactical planning and combat operations, completeness is essential for effective decision-making and mission success. Sacrificing completeness can lead to critical gaps in information, which might result in miscalculations or unforeseen challenges on the battlefield.

When brevity is prioritized over completeness, there's a risk of omitting important data or strategic elements necessary for understanding the full scope of the situation. This can compromise the ability of commanders and personnel to make informed decisions, ultimately affecting the overall mission. It is important to ensure that all relevant information is conveyed clearly to maintain situational awareness and strategic integrity. Thus, while brevity is valuable for communication and reduces confusion, it should never come at the cost of completeness, as doing so could hinder operational effectiveness.